
Talking as being a non-linguist with no instruction in the theory, but a local speaker using a life time of exposure to exercise, my ear would anticipate you to state "An important information is the fact my mom and dad opened a whole new restaurant a couple of weeks back." When you explained "have opened a restaurant a couple of weeks in the past", it would audio seriously off.
A normal Medieval farming Neighborhood would rather count the passage of times by the moon's waxing and waning. In that context, a 'moon' from the expression could well be a complete cycle in the moon, and so 'numerous moons back' would be just as normal to mention then as 'numerous months ago' might be now.
It is a superb issue, but the perform word "in the past" doesn't healthy into one of the traditional word courses.
3 @TylerS.Loeper but in that situation "penultimate" would only be considered a synonym of "preceding". Then you really'd require "pen-pen-supreme" and we are again at the same problem we started off with
Although it is understood what the coed is stating, for my part, it does audio incorrect. This is mainly resulting from the use of 'considering the fact that' in her illustration.
one implies that the motion occurred just now. You should normally see it in your e-mail software just after you ship an e-mail. Your program may possibly give you this concept to Permit you to understand that the information you merely sent has in fact been
However, quite a long time back indicates quite a long time back previously. Now, they might be made use of interchangeably in some cases, but after upon time
" In that context, "in" would propose you happen to be in some way stunned or unhappy that your birthday has not spontaneously reoccurred in that point -- a use That may be deployed humorously to take the sting nha thuoc tay out in the remark.
The significant thing is usually to recognize that "ago" derives through the previous participle "agone", a compound verb of to go intending to go.
)? I understand that the word "back" but alternatively that point Past Easy, but is it also probable to utilize the existing best in some instances?
I'd concluded my comment by mentioning conditions And just how 'back' is just not a case... and afterwards I noticed it doesn't appear grammatically to get an adverb a great deal of. So I took The difficulty to do some analysis and refuted myself: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temporal_case
Moreover, "opened" nha thuoc tay indicates "new", so "opened a brand new" feels somewhat redundant, or in any case, would not be the way I nha thuoc tay would be expecting anyone to phrase it (this applies whether or not your mom and dad took over an existing restaurant and opened it beneath a completely new identify or having a new design).
E.g, I have recognized him for ages/several years/quite a long time vs ungrammatical *I've seen him in ages/weeks/months/many years/a coon's age/donkey's several years.
Stack Exchange community contains 183 Q&A communities like Stack Overflow, the biggest, most trustworthy on-line community for builders to know, share their expertise, and Construct their careers. Visit Stack Trade